To compile an objective TOP of the best 4K TVs, I worked through the sales ratings of major Internet portals, studied expert reports, forums and customer reviews. The review includes models from different price segments, differing in characteristics, sound, Smart TV and advanced technologies. After reviewing the top 4K UHD TVs year, you will be able to get acquainted with the most interesting models and make a choice based on the criteria that are more valuable to you.
The best 4K TVs 43 inches
BBK 43LEX-6061 / UTS2C
A 2018 TV with a decent picture, albeit the cheapest in the ranking. The contrast ratio is the highest among the described 43-inch models (4000: 1). By brightness (250 cd / m22) is inferior to Thomson T43USM5200. When moving quickly across the screen, jerks and loops are noticeable due to the standard screen refresh rate. Two 8-watt speakers give normal sound for watching movies and programs, but it does not differ in depth. The backlighting is uneven when viewing content with Smart TV. The remote control buttons are unusually small and not very sensitive.
Benefits:
- 4K Ultra HD;
- HDR10 support;
- uniform illumination;
- powerful sound;
- built-in Wi-Fi;
- DLNA support;
- the ability to record movies, TV shows.
Disadvantages:
- medium smoothness of dynamic images;
- no TimeShift function;
- no voice control;
- no automatic brightness leveling;
- does not support bluetooth.
The price of the BBK 43LEX-6061 / UTS2C model is ... Despite the low price, the TV provides good image quality. In contrast, surpasses Thomson T43USM5200 behind , although it loses in brightness. Superior in sound power Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 43 behind , but in terms of volume and realism it loses to almost all rating models due to the lack of Dolby Digital. Due to the convenient location of the connectors, low power consumption and the presence of Smart TV at this price, this model is not the last in the ranking.
Thomson T43USM5200
2018 model with uniform backlighting that provides brightness when viewed in the dark. It has good color rendering and reproduces colors quite accurately. It differs from the BBK 43LEX-6061 / UTS2C in a lower pixel response - only 6.5 ms. The TV is great for gamers. Smart TV is not as functional as in Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 43. Management is complicated by the lack of voice search.
Benefits:
- refers to budget technology;
- large screen size;
- the ability to install on the wall;
- a large number of connectors;
- the ability to play 4K;
- sound and speaker quality;
- playback and recording to USB storage;
- you can play videos from the Internet;
- Supports Wi-Fi.
Disadvantages:
- does not work on Android;
- no curved screen;
- no built-in memory;
- no voice control;
- no bluetooth;
- no built-in camera.
Thomson T43USM5200 TV price is ... Model loses in contrast BBK 43LEX-6061 / UTS2C behind , but surpasses it in brightness and color rendition. From Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 43 behind features smooth display of dynamic scenes thanks to PPI - 1 thousand Hz.
Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 43
This TV of 2018 has a modern design, an ultra-thin bezel that is almost invisible (except for the bottom band). But due to the fact that the frame is not monolithic, there are small gaps. Has not very high brightness indicators (220 cd / m22) and contrast (1200: 1). There is no quality enhancement technology for displaying action scenes. The screen is glossy and reflective. The power of the speakers is only 12 W, which is lower than that of most of the models described. Thanks to the uniform illumination, there are no flares on the sides. All Xiaomi models have a convenient menu, PatchWall, voice control, the ability to display content from a smartphone on a large screen. Provides free semi-annual subscriptions to several popular cinemas.
Benefits:
- very convenient Android TV, intuitive menu, easy content search;
- high-quality voice search;
- ergonomic Bluetooth remote control. Smartphone control;
- low cost for a 4K TV.
Disadvantages:
- not very high-quality assembly;
- mediocre sound;
- not the best picture quality. It loses noticeably to competitors in brightness, smoothness of movement. According to reviews, the colors are unnatural, black is shallow, close to dark blue;
- there are highlights on the sides of the matrix;
- according to reviews, the legs are "flimsy". The wall mount bracket needs to be purchased clearly in size, since the holes on the TV are offset downward, so the universal bracket will stick out.
Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 43 price - total ... The TV displays 4K quality content well, but is inferior to competitors in brightness and color rendition: Thomson T43USM5200 behind and Philips 43PUS6503 for 30 thousand. It loses very much when displaying dynamic scenes, does not allow achieving excellent smoothness. Has a quiet mediocre sound (no bass). But Android TV provides great opportunities, it has a clear interface, a simple menu. A voice assistant, a small remote control with a minimum of buttons, and a smartphone application make operation convenient.
Philips 43PUS6503
The 2018 model provides more brightness than the Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 43 - 350 cd / m22... Reproduces blacks very well in dark scenes. To improve the contrast and clarity of the picture, Micro Dimming technology is used, there are no loops, jerks thanks to PPI at 900 Hz. The uniform backlight ensures that there is no glare when viewing in the dark, but there is no full-scale dimming. Smart TV on Saphi with a convenient simple menu, although in terms of functionality it loses to Android and webOS.
Benefits:
- full-fledged 4K TV with good technical equipment;
- low price;
- fairly smooth, bright and realistic picture with natural colors;
- great sound;
- many connectors;
- convenient Smart TV;
- large viewing angle;
- simple menu.
Disadvantages:
- the backlight has subtle blackouts in the form of vertical pillars in the central part of the screen;
- very inconvenient browser;
- no laser pointer or voice control for easy Smart operation.
Philips 43PUS6503 price - ... The picture quality is decent for a budget segment model. Good contrast, high color rendering. Possibly low brightness will not provide excellent HDR content. From LG 43UK6300 behind is smoother in action scenes. Compared to Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 43 for 25 thousand it differs in the quality of the backlight, the absence of light on the sides of the matrix. But it loses to competitors due to the lack of voice control. Philips' Saphi OS is somewhat simpler in terms of the menu. In general, the TV has a fairly high quality picture and sound. With a low cost, it can become a competitor to more expensive models.
LG 43UK6300
The 2018 TV is lightweight and easy to wall mount. Lower brightness than Philips 43PUS6503 - 200 cd / m22... It is clearly not enough for high-quality display of HDR content. The color accuracy can be improved by adjustments. The contrast is low - 1200: 1, it will not provide ideal clarity and detail. Philips 43PUS6503 loses out in smooth display of dynamic scenes due to the low image refresh index. Smart TV on webOS.Thanks to the intelligent control system, you can set the voice commands that it thinks over to give the correct answer. For voice interaction, you need the LG Magic Remote, which is not included.
Benefits:
- lightweight, more convenient mount;
- the TV has a very accurate realistic picture, reproduces 4K perfectly;
- excellent viewing angle;
- good sound;
- you can control the remote control, mouse;
- nimble operating system;
- reads all the most popular formats.
Disadvantages:
- legs are light, seem to be unstable;
- there is no LG Magic Remote in the kit, you need to buy it separately;
- no local dimming, blacks may look grayish;
- small amount of internal memory.
LG 43UK6300 price - ... It provides a bright and vibrant picture, fairly realistic and deep colors. Philips 43PUS6503 behind and Hyundai H-LED43U701BS2S behind differ in higher indicators of brightness, contrast. But LG 43UK6300 wins a little in terms of sound, the number of connectors and the presence of voice control. A great model for users who do not want to pay more for high-tech highlights. This is not a bad option for gamers.
HyundaiH-LED43U701BS2S
Model with an elegant design, it has excellent characteristics that provide a clear, realistic picture. High brightness (350 cd / m22), excellent color rendering, deep juicy colors, good contrast (3000: 1). To eliminate motion blur and tearing while moving around the screen, Motion Compensation technology is used. The sound is voluminous, deep, but somewhat worse in realism than in LG 43UK6300, due to the lack of a DTS decoder. Smart TV on Android provides the user with all the relevant benefits. There is no voice control.
Samsung UE43NU7400U
2018 model with attractive design, sharp and contrasting picture. Realistic images are provided by the 1700 Hz Picture Quality Index technology. It completely eliminates gaps and trails in action scenes. When viewing dark scenes, there are highlights on the sides of the matrix, and the black color is not deep enough. But the TV has a surprisingly thin matrix - only 59 cm. For comparison: Hyundai has its width - 99 mm. Some users find Smart TV on Tizen to be more functional and more convenient than Hyundai on Android.
Benefits:
- large screen (+ the ability to choose a different diagonal);
- powerful sound;
- slim, laconic design;
- voice control;
- support Wi-Fi, Bluetooth;
- SmartThing function;
- masking of cables.
Disadvantages:
- recording to USB or hard disk is impossible;
- there is no curved screen, there are highlights;
- poor bass reproduction;
- no HDMI cable;
- no screws for wall mounting.
Samsung UE43NU7400U for provides no less realistic picture with vibrant vibrant colors than Sony KD-43XF7005 behind ... According to reviews, it surpasses it in the capabilities of Smart TV, but it is somewhat inferior in depth and volume of sound due to the lack of a DTS decoder.
Sony KD-43XF7005
2018 TV with improved picture characteristics, which is typical of the manufacturer's seventh line. Deep vibrant colors (8-bit), good brightness (350 cd / m22). The picture is clear, detailed due to the high contrast (3300: 1). Due to the side illumination, when viewed in a dark room, highlights are visible on the sides of the matrix. But because of this method of illumination, the thickness of the matrix is only 58 mm. Smart TV on Linux is significantly inferior in functionality and convenience to the later models of the brand, which are equipped with Android.
Benefits:
- good color rendering, rich deep colors, image clarity;
- movements are smooth and well-trained. Suitable for games in HDR quality;
- many color settings to accurately set the image;
- the sound is good, but for music lovers you will need additional acoustics;
- moderately smart Smart. Fast and clear menu;
- easy Wi-Fi setup.
Disadvantages:
- too small a step of adjusting the sound;
- ineffective Smart: except YouTube, Netflix and a browser, there is nothing to use. New software is not installed;
- large legs do not add appeal.
The price of the KD-43XF7005 model is ... Quite a reasonable price for a high-quality realistic image in 4K. A TV without such an opportunity with a smaller diagonal is (Sony KDL-40WD653).But the cheaper model lags behind in smooth playback of dynamic scenes and brightness. A significant disadvantage of the TV in question is Smart TV on Linux, but Sony KD-49XF7596 on Android will cost already . The last one loses in contrast. In general, the model is more than worthy taking into account the detail and realism of the picture, but you should not expect much from the outdated Smart TV.
The best 4K TVs 49 inches
HARPER 49U750TS
2018 model with a bright, juicy image (300 f / m2), an improved indicator of dynamic contrast, when the backlight automatically becomes brighter in the light frame and fades in the dark. The pixel response is lower than the TCL L50P6US - 6.5 ms. But due to the standard index for updating the picture with fast movement in the frame, jerks and loops are possible. Smart TV on Android provides more features, but is slower. According to reviews, YouTube, ivi and other applications slow down.
Benefits:
- decent quality for little money;
- color rendition;
- bright, contrast matrix;
- Ultra HD screen resolution;
- Smart TV with good functionality;
- appearance and beautiful shell of Android;
- support for satellite TV and T2;
- optical audio output + ARC.
Disadvantages:
- small amount of internal memory;
- The remote control does not work in all Android applications.
The price of HARPER 49U750TS TV is . The TV has sufficient technical parameters for high-quality 4K display. Due to the low input lag, which gamers will appreciate, surpasses TCL L50P6US behind . But in terms of realism and sound depth, it is slightly inferior to both TCL and Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 50 behind . The model is decent. Ideal for those who plan to use it as a monitor for the console.
TCL L50P6US
The 2018 model differs from the HARPER 49U750TS in a longer pixel response time (8 ms), because of which it will not be able to “pull” all games qualitatively. But it has a high contrast - 4000: 1, which is not typical of budget televisions. Supports HDR, and thanks to thoughtful equipment plays files in this format flawlessly. The frame refresh rate is slightly higher - 60 Hz, but this does not help to completely eliminate the blurriness in fast scenes.
Benefits:
- clear 4K resolution;
- large diagonal;
- Smart TV
- thin frames;
- good color reproduction, sufficient brightness;
- convenient interface.
Disadvantages:
- weak bass speakers;
- no support for many audio tracks;
- OS Linux platform.
TCL L50P6US per It displays colors well, has a realistic picture with good detail. There are possible flashes on the sides, the response from the remote control slows down a little, but the biggest minus of the model is Smart on Linux with the lack of the ability to update software.
Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 50
2018 model with a clear realistic 4K image without highlights. The sound power is inferior to the LG 49UK6200, as it has two 8-watt speakers, as well as cheaper TVs. There is voice control. The internal memory is twice as much as in LG - 8 GB. Smart TV is not Russified, but this does not bother users, since it provides a large application store. User-friendly interface, offers content on demand, plays files from a smartphone.
Benefits:
- ease of management;
- voice commands;
- screen with 4K resolution;
- minimalistic design;
- Android and the PatchWall shell.
Disadvantages:
- lack of DVB-T2 and DVB-S2;
- incomplete Russification;
- problems with the analog signal.
The price of TV is . Inferior in color and clarity in action scenes LG 49UK6200having a similar price. Thanks to Android TV, free subscriptions and a host of apps is superior TCL L50P6US behind .
LG 49UK6200
2018 TV with excellent color reproduction (color depth - 8 bits). Provides a Picture Mastering Index - 1500 Hz, so the image of dynamic scenes is much smoother than in Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 50. Due to the uniform illumination there are no highlights, like in Samsung UE49NU7100U, and dark tones are displayed more clearly. Smart TV on webOS with a convenient interface and application search. A special section provides access to 200 channels, so the antenna connection is not required. It features an intelligent voice recognition system and requests, but the Magic remote required for this is not included.
Benefits:
- clear realistic picture with good reproduction of the entire gamut of colors. Smooth frame change;
- volumetric realistic sound;
- convenient application store;
- works fast. Doesn't lose Wi-Fi;
- instant channel tuning;
- instead of a remote control, you can use a smartphone;
- quick response;
- the fork is curved, does not bend.
Disadvantages:
- lack of a Magic remote control in the package, you need to buy it separately;
- there is no separate button on the remote to activate the timer. It is required to walk through the menu in search of him;
- confusing, complex menu;
- some buyers believe that there are too many sound and picture settings, it is difficult to understand;
- insufficient internal memory;
- preinstalled programs cannot be removed;
- short cable;
- Smart slows down a little;
- the legs are fragile, not credible.
LG 49UK6200 price - ... Differs in clarity of reproduction, realistic colors, raising the quality level of mediocre content to 4K. Provides smooth frame changes when quickly moving around the screen, which is not available Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 50 behind ... It surpasses the latter in sound power, and in terms of depth it is slightly ahead of the second competitor - Samsung UE49NU7100U behind ... The TV has a number of drawbacks, including a complicated menu and not quite fast Smart, but for the indicated price the model is more than decent.
Samsung UE49NU7100U
2018 model with a thin sensor - only 60 mm (20 mm thinner than the LG 49UK6200). Provides a realistic, crisp picture, similar to watching in a movie theater. The 1300 Hz Picture Quality Index technology does not allow jerks, trails, even with very fast movement across the screen. The indicator is slightly lower than in LG 49UK6200, but visually it is invisible. According to reviews, it is equipped with a fast and convenient Smart TV. Unlike LG 49UK6200, it does not provide voice control.
Benefits:
- fast and smooth Smart TV;
- fair HDR10;
- low latency gaming mode;
- good built-in web browser;
- great picture in 4K.
Disadvantages:
- lack of built-in Bluetooth;
- Wi-Fi module - not 5 GHz, which negatively affects the download speed of 4K content over the air;
- no support for DTS audio tracks.
Samsung UE49NU7100U for somewhat loses in contrast Sony KD-49XF8096 behind , which is expected. But the picture corresponds to the level of 4K and HDR, the colors are displayed correctly. When viewed from any angle, the colors do not change brightness. Due to the lack of a decoder, DTS is slightly inferior in sound realism LG 49UK6200 behind ... The model is in the group of leaders of this segment.
Sony KD-49XF8096
2018 model with amazingly sharp and realistic images. 4KX-Reality PRO technology improves the quality of the picture when viewing online, working out every detail and contrast between them. Perfectly displays dynamic scenes thanks to Motionflow XR 400 Hz. When viewed in a dark room, slight flares are noticeable on the sides, which is not the case in LG 49UK6200. The remote is mediocre, outdated, but provides voice control. Built-in memory is four times that of LG - 16 GB.
Benefits:
- strict, stylish appearance;
- good even backlighting;
- very high quality natural picture, with excellent color reproduction and clear realistic image;
- dynamic scenes works well;
- the sound is great;
- stable Wi-Fi connection;
- Android works well, convenient and simple Smart;
- a large number of connectors.
Disadvantages:
- the plastic stand looks mediocre;
- an external power supply makes it inconvenient for wall mounting;
- the screen display moves freely in the case, forming a gap, where dust accumulates over time;
- not all applications for download in the Play Market;
- the remote is not very easy to use;
- the headphone jack is on the back, not the side.
Sony KD-49XF8096 price - ... In this segment, the TV leads all the way, despite the old-fashioned remote control and the plastic stand. The TV is characterized by a bright natural picture, high-quality backlighting, excellent sound, and good functionality. Prices for competitors are lower: LG 49UK6200 – , Samsung UE49NU7100U - 36 thousand. They are somewhat inferior to Sony in terms of picture quality, smoothness of frame changes in dynamic scenes. They differ in a smaller number of connectors, the absence of a headphone output. Samsung TV does not have Bluetooth, it loses a little in sound.But LG 49UK6200 has a more uniform backlighting, although because of this, a thicker matrix. It can be argued that the Sony KD-49XF8096 is one of the best options in this size range, although it has a significant price compared to competitors.
The best 4K TVs 50–55 inches
Polarline 50PU11TC-SM
TV years with good color rendering, brightness, and wide viewing angles. Thanks to Direct LED backlighting, black tones are displayed correctly, when viewed from the side, colors do not lose much in brightness, and dark scenes are shown without flare. But in action scenes, users notice slight jerks. Smart TV on Android, 8 GB of internal memory, Dolby Digital make it stand out over Philips and Hyundai. Accepts terrestrial, cable TV, unlike Philips 50PUT6023, which does not have DVB-C.
Benefits:
- Cost;
- bright juicy colors;
- convenient management;
- strict appearance;
- the presence of all the necessary connectors;
- functional.
Disadvantages:
- Weak hardware component;
- poor sound quality;
- high image contrast (default);
- slowdown during work;
- unstable operation of the operating system (according to user reviews).
Polarline 50PU11TC price - ... Unlike Hyundai H-LED50U507BS2 behind and Philips 50PUT6023 for 26 it is equipped with Smart TV. Provides advantages in the form of a cinema, access to applications, but is somewhat inferior in the quality of displaying details. The sound is quite voluminous, realistic, but not very loud.
Hyundai H-LED50U507BS2
Model years without Smart TV. In contrast, the Polarline 50PU11TC-SM does not support the HDR standard. The color spectrum renders accurately, provides decent clarity due to the excellent contrast ratio, which is not typical for models in this price segment - 3000: 1. With rapid movements on the screen, gaps are visible, since the manufacturer does not use smoothing smoothing technologies. If you watch TV in the dark, sometimes highlights are visible, but this is more likely due to side lighting. More powerful sound than Polarline or Philips 50PUT6023 due to the presence of two 10W speakers. It accepts all types of digital television broadcast signals, while Polarline does not provide satellite television.
Benefits:
- nice design;
- high-quality assembly. No creaks, no backlash;
- excellent contrast and bright image with good color reproduction;
- large viewing angles;
- simple settings, user-friendly interface.
Disadvantages:
- the sound quality is not very deep and realistic. For some cases, you need to connect additional speakers or speakers;
- very tight buttons on the remote. He himself is big, uncomfortable;
- the screen glare, but not much;
- no optical output.
Hyundai H-LED50U507BS2 price -... The TV provides more than decent display quality. For most indicators (brightness, contrast, color reproduction) ahead Philips 50PUT6023 for 26 thousand. Loses in sound Polarline 50PU11TC-SM behind since it does not have Dolby Digital. For this price segment, Hyundai is more than a decent TV with minor minuses. Users often purchase a model for connecting to a PC or external set-top box, and not for use as a TV, and it is ideal for this.
Philips 50PUT6023
2018 model without Smart TV. Unlike the Kivi, the 55UR50GR is not designed for HDR playback. It has a mediocre sound, as it is equipped with two 8 W speakers. The viewing angles are wide, although when viewing with a strong deviation from the center of the color, they change slightly, the brightness decreases. For games, watching dynamic scenes is not very suitable because of the standard frame refresh index.
Benefits:
- Reasonable price;
- thin;
- original stand in the form of legs;
- excellent image and sound quality;
- high screen resolution;
- the ability to play files from external devices;
- recording video to a flash drive.
Disadvantages:
- Lack of Smart TV;
- insufficient stability of the stand;
- no tuner DVB-S2;
- some users speak negatively about the design of the remote control.
Philips 50PUT6023 price - ... From Hyundai H-LED50U507BS2 for 21 thousand it differs in less detail and clarity of the picture, sound power. The TV is tuned to receive terrestrial television only. From Kivi 55UR50GR behind notable for the lack of Smart TV.Good budget TV with a minimum of possibilities.
Kivi 55UR50GR
2018 TV significantly differs from Philips 50PUT6023 in brightness level (520 cd / m22) and contrast (10000: 1). They provide ultra-sharp images with the finest detail. By improving the smoothness of MEMC 800 Hz frames, scenes with fast movement across the screen are perfectly played out. The sound is provided by two 12 W speakers, which is 1.5 times more powerful than in the Xiaomi Mi TV 4 55. Provides 8 GB of internal memory, but there is no voice control.
Benefits:
- reasonable price;
- great image;
- frame rate - 60FPS;
- 4K playback even online;
- innovative design;
- USB 3.0;
- good sound quality;
- powerful hardware;
- Android TV 7.0;
- Bluetooth
- the ability to control from a smartphone;
- compact remote control with a minimum of necessary buttons;
- manufacturer's warranty - 3 years.
Disadvantages:
- some users notice highlights on the matrix;
- turns on for a long time;
- lack of TimeShift;
- no teletext;
- lack of Google Play, instead of it is Aptoide TV - the options are the same, but some users do not like the interface.
Price TV Kivi 55UR50GR - ... Due to the depth and realism of the image, the model can be placed on a par with more expensive and popular brands. She is superior Xiaomi Mi TV 4 55 behind by the degree of detail and smoothness of the display of especially dynamic scenes. AND Philips 50PUT6023 for 26 thousand loses in sound quality and due to the lack of Smart TV.
Xiaomi Mi TV 4 55
2017 TV with the thinnest frame, ultra-thin matrix - only 48 mm. Despite the lower contrast ratio than in the Kivi 55UR50GR - 5000: 1, the clarity and display quality of the TV is excellent. In the dark, the backlight is not uniform. There is no support in Russian. Voice control is provided.
Benefits:
- Ultra-thin and frameless screen;
- high-quality body materials;
- convenient location of connectors;
- good sound;
- wireless technologies WiFi, Bluetooth, DLNA;
- control from a smartphone or voice;
- Android TV 7.0 with MIUI shell;
- quick response;
- USB 3.0;
- convenient location of connectors;
- wide multimedia features.
Disadvantages:
- Glare on the matrix when the TV is placed opposite the light source;
- lack of DVB-T / T2 / T2-HD / C / S / S2 tuners;
- lack of component input;
- image loop when the noise reduction mode is on;
- the built-in media player does not read all formats.
The price of TV Xiaomi Mi TV 4 55 is ... It provides an excellent picture quality, looks modern, since the frame is almost invisible. The disadvantage of the model is the low sound power, which is why it loses Kivi 55UR50GR behind . LG 55SK8100 for 58 thousand it is inferior in the smoothness of displaying dynamic scenes and the lack of support for Dolby Vision.
LG 55SK8100
2018 model equipped with Nano Cell technology. It involves the use of nanoparticles for backlighting. Because of this, colors are transmitted more accurately: the entire color spectrum is covered, so the picture has the most realistic look. It features low power consumption - 122 watts. There is voice control, multi-brand remote control. WebOS platform: many consider it more convenient and functional than Android.
Benefits:
- Beautiful design;
- reliable assembly materials;
- high quality picture and sound;
- quick response;
- convenient remote control;
- can be controlled from a smartphone or voice.
Disadvantages:
- Unstable stand;
- highlights on the matrix, which are visible in complete darkness;
- few installed Smart TV applications;
- functionality and interface of the built-in browser;
- webOS.
LG 55SK8100 for reproduces rich, realistic colors when viewed from any angle. Despite the lower rate of the image refresh index than that of Sony KD-55XF7596 for 60 thousand, does an excellent job displaying action scenes. Is superior Xiaomi Mi TV 4 55 behind depth and power of sound.
Sony KD-55XF7596
The 2018 model reproduces vibrant, rich, realistic colors. 4K X-Reality Pro processes frames online for maximum detail. Motionflow XR 400Hz improves smooth frame rates for fast screen movements, so there is no tearing or jerking. Highlights are invisible when viewed in the dark. The depth of black is slightly inferior to Samsung QE55Q6FNA with QLED technology. Has a large amount of internal memory - 16 GB.It is equipped with an intelligent system that recognizes voice commands and produces a result on request.
Benefits:
- perfect picture, bright contrasting tones, high color reproduction, realistic shades;
- good smoothness of frame changes in dynamic scenes;
- excellent sound that does not require additional amplifiers;
- Smart TV works without freezing;
- simplicity of settings, you can install the application to access all video content;
- A large selection of applications, movies and game library. Supports games from the tablet.
Disadvantages:
- ugly legs, looks better on the wall;
- outdated remote control;
- according to some buyers, Android specifically slows down.
Price Sony KD-55XF7596 - . A television has better specs for smoother display and contrast than LG 55SK8100 for 58 thousand. It differs from it by a more uniform backlight, without possible glare and loss of brightness on the sides. Sony is slightly inferior in contrast and color reproduction Samsung QE55Q6FNAbut the latter is equipped with QLED technology. In terms of sound, Samsung also wins due to the presence of a subwoofer, but it has a significantly higher price - . Sony provides a realistic picture with good detail, great sound. If there is no desire to overpay for additional technologies, this model will be an excellent choice.
Samsung QE55Q6FNA
2018 QLED TV with ultra-clear image, excellent color reproduction and contrast. Thanks to the Supreme UHD Dimming technology, dark scenes are striking in the depth of black tones. KD-55XF7596 differs from Sony by a higher refresh rate index (200 Hz), several improvement technologies. Therefore, the smallest details when instantly moving the screen are displayed with maximum accuracy. The manufacturer paid particular attention to sound. This is the only model in this section of the rating with an additional 20 W subwoofer.
Benefits:
- Good image quality;
- Ambient technologies, Q Engine;
- powerful acoustics with subwoofer;
- hidden cable management;
- 4 x HDMI
Disadvantages:
- No USB 3.0;
- Tizen operating system takes time to get used to;
- not all applications are installed on the Tizen OS;
- in some firmware versions it does not play avi format, the number of supported video codecs is cut;
- HDR mode excludes the use of other image settings;
- in dynamic scenes there is a small loop of the image;
- does not turn on on the Smart TV homepage.
Samsung QE55Q6FNA for Expectedly superior to TV Sony KD-55XF7596 for 60 and LG 55SK8100 for 58 thousand on most indicators. This is explained by QLED technology, which provides surprisingly realistic colors, good brightness. The model can be called a leader in this subcategory, although it surpasses its competitors in price.
The best 4K TVs 65 inches
Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 65 Pro
Budget TV with a diagonal of 65 ″. Released in 2016. Technological equipment at a height that practically does not affect the price. The picture is quite bright, with realistic colors and excellent contrast - 5000: 1, which does not provide Philips 65PUS6412 or Sony KD-65XF9005. Xiaomi does not have enhancement technology to display dynamic scenes. Due to the uniform illumination, dark scenes are displayed without flare or a strong color change. The sound is not striking because of the standard speakers at 8 watts. As with all Xiaomi models, the choice of content to view is very wide, there is PatchWall, a free subscription to popular applications for six months.
Benefits:
- Original design, very thin frames.
- The image is bright, the detail is excellent, the color conveys correctly.
- Ergonomic remote control, voice control.
- Convenient Smart TV with personalized recommendations.
- Reasonable cost.
Disadvantages:
- The sound is weak.
- In dynamic scenes there are trains, jerks.
- The build quality of some users is doubtful, there are gaps between the frame and the matrix.
- The legs are not credible.
Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 65 Pro costs , which is justified for a TV 65 diagonal with 4K. He loses a little to his competitor: Sony KD-55XF7596 behind with an impeccable vivid picture and excellent sound, but overall, Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 65 Pro provides a decent decent contrast image and has an excellent Smart TV with a large selection of content.
Philips 65PUS6412
The 2017 model with a good brightness for a budget TV - 350 cd / m2. It can not surprise with clear detail due to a mediocre contrast indicator. In addition to uniform diode illumination, the TV is equipped with Ambilight backlighting. It duplicates the brightness and color scheme in the form of a light halo. This creates the illusion of a deeper, more realistic image. For smooth display with fast frame changes, a PPI index of 900 Hz is provided. The TV in this parameter is practically not inferior to the Sony KD-65XF9005.
Benefits:
- large diagonal - 65 inches;
- modern matrix;
- Ambilight technology
- good image quality;
- functions TimeShift, DNLA;
- a large number of connectors;
- Android operating system
- Beautiful design;
- Russian keyboard.
Disadvantages:
- insufficient quality sound;
- unfinished Android;
- recessed connectors on the rear panel.
Philips TV price 65PUS6412 - . It is inferior in contrast Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 65 Probut wins over him in sound power. Expectedly inferior Sony KD-65XF9005 for 160 thousand in the impeccability of the display of colors, detail pictures. But the shortcomings are somewhat offset by additional backlighting. For models with a diagonal of 65 ″ among the "state employees" Philips shows excellent results.
Sony KD-65XF9005
2018 TV. Philips 65PUS6412 has better color rendering, brightness (500 cd / m2) and contrast (6000: 1). Provides a flawlessly clear picture with maximum detail. Equipped with Motionflow XR 1000 Hz to improve smoothness while moving quickly around the screen. There are no highlights or dim displays of dark scenes due to uniform lighting. Although the depth of black is slightly inferior to Samsung QE65Q7FNA with QLED technology. Like the Philips 65PUS6412, it has voice control, 16 GB of internal memory.
Benefits:
- Matrix VA;
- large screen;
- ultrathin;
- stable stand;
- Android OS
- the picture looks clear even with a resolution of 720 px.
Disadvantages:
- Overpriced;
- poor quality sound;
- few features;
- DNLA does not always work.
Sony KD-65XF9005 TV for 160 thousand expectedly superior Philips 65PUS6412 behind in almost all respects except for the smoothness of the image. But in terms of playback quality, sound depth inferior Samsung QE65Q7FNA for 170 thousand. But in Sony KD-65XF9005 a flawless picture. You can notice the difference with Samsung only when viewing certain content.
Samsung QE65Q7FNA
2018 QLED TV with vivid and realistic color display. Provides deep black, crystal clear white, excellent image quality in dark scenes. Thanks to the point-off of organic diodes, perfect contrast and clarity are achieved. To improve smoothness in action scenes, a PQI of 3200 Hz is provided. Unlike Sony, the KD-65XF9005 has four speakers and a subwoofer (total power 60 watts). Russian-language interface, built-in electronic manual, many settings for smoothness / brightness / contrast. It has a remote unit for connecting wires, so the aesthetics are improved, the minimum matrix thickness is 47 mm.
Benefits:
- Large diagonal ;.
- high-quality anti-reflective coating;
- design is universal.
Disadvantages:
- Bad sound;
- does not support avi format;
- Bluetooth is intermittent;
- inconvenient remote control;
- high price;
- no wall mount bolts.
Samsung QE65Q7FNA for striking depth and realism of the picture. Slightly superior Sony KD-65XF9005 for 160 thousand, famous for its good quality. In depth and sound power ahead LG OLED65C8 behind . The only minus of the TV is the lack of voice control.
LG OLED65C8
2018 model. An OLED TV has the same picture quality benefits as the Samsung QE65Q7FNA. It features a lower sound power (40 W), although it also has 4 speakers and a subwoofer. There is a multi-brand remote, Magic Remote for voice control. LG Smart ThinQ technology gives the TV artificial intelligence. He receives data from other devices, self-learns, understands the habits and needs of the owner.
Benefits:
- IPS Matrix;
- large diagonal;
- gorgeous image in 4K;
- loud, high-quality sound;
- Clear Voice III feature
- supports technology HDR, WiDi, DNLA.
Disadvantages:
- high price - ;
- unfinished console;
- weak graphics card.
LG OLED65C8 for provides perfect color reproduction with deep detail, clarity as Samsung QE65Q7FNA for 170 thousand. The depth and realism of sound surpasses Sony KD-65XF9005 behind , and the power is slightly inferior to Samsung QE65Q7FNA. This is one of the most "advanced" rating models.
Best 4K TVs 75 inches
Erisson 75ULEA99T2 Smart
2018 budget TV with mediocre specs, no quality enhancement options. Despite the good brightness (330 cd / m22) and color rendering, has a low contrast - 1200: 1. Because of this, the picture is good, but not super sharp. The TV has standard pixel response rates (8ms) and refresh index (50Hz). Therefore, with sudden movements on the screen, jerks and plumes are clearly visible. The TV is not tuned to receive a satellite signal.
Benefits:
- Good viewing angle.
- The picture quality is normal. 4K UHD content displays beautifully with an immersive experience.
- The sound is sufficient for watching channels, movies, but without the Dolby effect.
- Sufficient number of connectors.
- Availability of Smart TV.
Disadvantages:
- No HDR support.
- The Smart interface is not very user-friendly. Loading takes some time.
- Complicated, incomprehensible menu.
- Backlight stripes are visible on a black screen (not critical).
- Cannot be connected to the same network with other devices.
- Does not receive satellite signals.
Erisson 75ULEA99T2 Smart for will be a good option for those who want a large TV for a low price. Compared to LG 75SK8100 NanoCell behind lags very much behind in smoothness, clarity, color rendition and sound. No voice control and free app subscriptions like in Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 75 behind .
Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 75
This 2018 TV has an attractive design, ultra-thin bezel and advanced features. Provides rich, realistic colors and good detail. Thanks to Direct LED backlighting, colors do not change brightness when viewed from off-center or in a dark room. Android TV provides tons of content, access to a wide variety of store options, and a free 6 month subscription to several popular apps. Facilitates the use of a voice controlled remote control.
Benefits:
- Nice design, thin frame.
- Excellent image quality, natural bright picture, high definition, 4K, HDR.
- Realistic surround sound.
- Smart TV on Android.
- Extensive media library.
- Voice control.
- Intelligent control system.
Disadvantages:
- No T2 support.
- The default firmware is in Chinese. You can solve the problem with a decoder and connecting a TV set-top box with firmware in Russian.
Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 75 for provides a good picture at a low price. The biggest disadvantage is the low-power sound. It is even worse than in Erisson 75ULEA99T2 Smart behind ... Compared to LG 75SK8100 NanoCell for 149 thousand, Xiaomi lags far behind both in sound and in picture quality, especially in color rendition and smoothness of movement on the screen.
LG 75SK8100 NanoCell
2018 model with Nano Cell for accurate and realistic color spectrum. Despite the side lighting, all colors are displayed evenly across the entire screen surface and even when viewed from a wide angle. Due to Nano Cell technology, the TV is energy efficient - 215 watts. For comparison, the Samsung UE75NU8000U draws 255 watts. The use of frame improvement technologies provides TruMotion 200 Hz and PMI 2900 Hz. This means that action scenes are reproduced with the smallest detail, absolute clarity. The model provides a multi-brand remote control with voice control. The manufacturer paid special attention to the sound - 4 speakers of 10 W each, a subwoofer.
Benefits:
- remote control with microphone for voice recognition. Works like a laser pointer: it is very convenient to type the names of a movie or a website on the opening keyboard;
- Smart TV works perfectly and quickly. A large number of applications, access to the store;
- side backlighting, which does not affect the display quality, although the image on the sides is somewhat dimmer;
- excellent color rendering;
- there are no jerks in dynamic scenes. When watching sports programs, the picture is clear;
- low input-lag, fast response time.
Disadvantages:
- in the dark, instead of black, a grayish color is displayed;
- peak brightness is not at the highest level;
- there are contrast issues.
LG 75SK8100 for expectedly better than Xiaomi Mi TV 4S 75 for 115 almost all indicators, providing a juicy, realistic picture with the smallest detail. From Samsung UE75NU8000U behind differs in the quality of the backlight, in which side flares are excluded.
Samsung UE75NU8000U
2018 TV with very high quality picture, increased contrast and excellent color reproduction. Thanks to the side illumination, the manufacturer has made a thin matrix - 58 mm. Although when displaying dark scenes, there may be slight flares on the sides. Due to the high PQI update index (2500 Hz), smoothness in dynamic scenes is on top. Like the LG 75SK8100, the model is equipped with a 20W subwoofer and two 10W speakers. But there is no DTS decoder, so the depth and realism of the sound is slightly worse than that of LG.
Benefits:
- thin, beautiful body, lack of frame makes it look like Samsung mobile products;
- high-quality assembly;
- convenient management interface;
- bright, beautiful colors, high-quality picture without matrix light;
- normal sound of native speakers. In terms of richness of sound, it can lose in comparison with LG and Sony;
- good processor, high-quality video processing;
- good horizontal viewing angles.
Disadvantages:
- jerks in dynamic scenes are noticeable when watching a video;
- too simple built-in player that has no settings;
- Edge LED backlight;
- Bixby's assistant doesn't help much.
Samsung UE75NU8000U for slightly inferior LG 75SK8100 NanoCell for 149 thousand in color reproduction and brightness when viewing in the dark, since the latter has Nano Cell technology. Superior to him Sony KD-75XF9005 behind in terms of power and sound quality, smooth display of action scenes. But there is no voice control available from both competitors.
Sony KD-75XF9005
2018 TV with excellent contrast and brightness, juicy realistic colors of the entire spectrum. The picture is flawless, like most Sony TVs in recent years. The model has uniform illumination, so there are no highlights, changes in the reproduction of very light or dark scenes. The index of quality improvement when updating frames is high - Motionflow XR 1000 Hz. But it is smaller than the Samsung UE75NU8000U and LG 75SK8100. Although in most dynamic scenes this is almost invisible. It has 16 GB of internal memory, voice control and smart Smart TV on Android.
Benefits:
- beautiful view, narrow frame;
- suitable for home theater;
- uniform illumination without glare;
- excellent black color, good detail in dark scenes;
- bright, rich colors, realistic image, high contrast;
- good sound quality with an immersive effect;
- smart Smart TV.
Disadvantages:
- in HDR mode around bright objects extra backlight;
- some buyers note the lack of Dolby Vision (firmware update required);
- the Android platform "slows down";
- only one USB3.0 port (the rest 2.0);
- darkening in the corners of the screen due to insufficient viewing angle.
TV Sony KD-75XF9005 for can be called the leader of the TOP in this category because of the impeccable picture. But the model lags behind in the smoothness of frame change in action scenes from Samsung UE75NU8000U behind and LG 75SK8100 NanoCell for 149 thousand. It also loses to them in power and depth of sound due to the lack of a subwoofer.